Friday, August 16, 2013

Judge Maureen Sogluizzo: Bias Against Mothers




WE ARE TIRED OF THIS JUDGE AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY LONGER!  WE DEMAND A FULL INVESTIGATION INTO THE CONDUCT OF JUDGE MAUREEN SOGLUIZZO- THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF HUDSON COUNTY, NJ FAMILY COURT.   A WOMAN WHO HAS NO CHILDREN- AND HAS AN EXTREME BIAS AGAINST MOTHERS.  THIS WOMAN IS NOT FAIR MINDED, NOT REASONABLE, AND ROBEPROBE SHOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS MONSTER IN A ROBE!  A TRUE NAZI!  SHE SITS ON HER THRONE AS SHE TAKES KIDS FROM MOMS BY THE DOZENS- BANKRUPTS MOMS- AND HIDES CHILD ABUSE!  MONSTER!


For starters- I know multiple moms dealing with this woman- some of whom will not come forward with specific details of their cases for fear of retaliation.  I also have transcripts from other moms who have appeared in her Nazi kingdom.  I will break down a couple cases now- all these moms have a mutual factor- they are pro se against highly connected firms- (This county is long known to be corrupt- and there is good reason to believe that)

We have a mom who lost custody of her child due to one unjust decision of a court-  Sogluizzo then used only portions of reports to uphold, and support the taking of a child from a mom. The mom is a good, stable, loving mom.  There is no child abuse, and no neglect.  Mom is not afforded joint custody- or liberal parenting time.  Why is that important to know?  Because when a father does not have custody- he is given liberal parenting time- and is always heading to the goal of joint custody.  The moms are the opposite- when a mom does not have custody- she has a weekend a month.  Mom will never regain joint custody once dad has it.  Why?  Because- this is a patriarchal society.   Father's rights special interest groups have taken over the American court.  They own these judges.  (By the way- I refuse to use capital letters for a judge-- many are dishonorable and do not deserve it)

OK- so mom loses custody- has limited parenting time (usually a mom will have to beg to get off supervised visits- and she only gets supervised to begin with because she does not "like" the father)  In another case before the monster- the judge actually hides child abuse so the dad will not lose his parenting time- sick woman!

Now- the father begins to file motion after motion.  In a clear attempt to break the mother (who is pro se) he drags mom into court over and over.  Mom is pro se because they ran her penniless- (another common factor)  Sogluizzo changes her own orders- at one time saying a relocation motion was denied because it was not in child's best interest- but she gives hints to the father about how to win the motion next time.  The father returns with the motion- and is granted a motion to relocate out of state.  Sogluizzo holds jurisdiction of the case however, so mom can still be tormented by her orders.   Sogluizzo hates when people file appeals against her Nazi orders- so she punished mom by ordering her to pay dad's legal fees.  Now- dad has a great - crooked lawyer.  Mom has no lawyer- but now she has to pay the dad's lawyer.  Mom is now forced to move out of state too if she wishes to see her child at all.  Mom will have to leave her entire family- and is not even being given additional time when and if she relocates.  Her parenting time will not change- and is limited.  A child has an absolute right to her mother.  Sogluizzo actually expected mom to continue to fly back and forth to see her child- the child was forced to leave her NJ family- leave her mom- her school- her friends- and all for what?  So dad can torture mom- and have the child raised by babysitters!  Why should a child be sent to be raised by sitters and stepmonsters when they have a fit, caring mom?  Why?

Sogluizzo expects to hold this case- even though she allowed the child to relocate out of state.  She expects to enforce mom to pay legal fees she has no ability to pay.  The bottom line- Sogluizzo is out of her mind- she needs to get off this bench and go home to be bitter over the fact she is not a mother.  She also needs to get a new haircut- she is a joke-  Report this monster to Judge Peter T Bariso in Hudson County- or the Administrative Judge- Judge Glen Grant- enough of this monster nazi - People who ignore her conduct are just as guilty as her- the day has come- go home Sogluizzo !

More and more moms are coming forward about her- if you sit in her court on a given day- you will see how many "fathers" have custody- why?  These are regular moms- moms who were primary caregivers- and her attitude toward moms who gave up careers to raise kids is disgusting.  She clearly is carrying some personal vendetta with her-

2 comments:

  1. Ojala alguien me pueda ayudar !!! el dia 31 de enero 2014 tube corte con la Jueza Maureen Sogluizzo y de la forma mas cruel y sanguinaria me quitaron toda posibilidad de ver a mis hijitas esta jueza en menos de 10 minutos denego mi caso sin leer mis evidencias de 200pgs. donde con pruebas y videos le muestro el atropello y mentiras que cometieron conmigo ya que no veo a mis hijitas hace 8 años ahora que porfin logre reunir mas evidencias ella lo tiro al lado se burlo de mi me dijo que me olvidara que YO ERA SU MADRE QUE ELLA YA TENIAN MADRE Y QUE NI PIENSE QUE ELLAS VAN A CONOCER A SUS HERMANITOS QUE ME VAYA CON MI FAMILIA Y QUE ME OLVIDE DE ELLAS HASTA FUE CAPAZ DE DECIRME QUE MIS HIJITAS ME ODIAN pero que no me preocupe que espere que EL PAPA DE MIS HIJAS SE MUERA PARA QUE LAS RECUPERE no me dejo defenderme , se paro sin educacion alguna y me dejo con la palabra en la boca ,llorando y ella muy tranquila hasta vio como el Padre de mis hijas se burlaba de mi y ella como si nada, como si disfrutara de lo que pasara... Por Favor ayudenme y comuniquense conmigo mi correo es dchio75@hotmail.com yo les puede relatar todo mi caso ,gracias de antemano.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't read Spanish, but I will respond in defense of Judge Sogliuzzo. Before I continue, I disclose that I, as a father, am involved in a federal lawsuit against her for violating my civil rights. It's upsetting to see so many complaints that she hates mothers. This is not so in my 14 years of court experience with her. She is not fair, nor does she follow the law, nor does she protect children, but she is NOT a mother hater. Growing up in Hudson County, I've noticed she is part of the "good ole boy's club", typically ruling in favor of the party represented by attorneys she knows. Custody and parenting should always be equal, and at least she recognizes that father's should be part of their kid's lives. That said, it's not about her being a mother or father hater, it's about her not following the rule of law.

    ReplyDelete