Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 1, 2021

Tanner Cross, Teacher in Loudoun County, Wins Court Ruling Allowing Him To Refuse To Use Transgender Students' Pronouns

Byron "Tanner" Cross

Court Backs A Teacher Who Refused To Use Transgender Students' Pronouns

August 31, 2021, AP

RICHMOND, Va. — The Supreme Court of Virginia has upheld a lower court ruling that ordered the reinstatement of a northern Virginia gym teacher who said he won't refer to transgender students by their pronouns.

Loudoun County Public Schools appealed to the state Supreme Court after a judge ruled that the school system violated the free speech rights of teacher Tanner Cross by suspending him after he spoke up at a school board meeting.

Cross, a teacher at Leesburg Elementary, cited his religious convictions at a May board meeting in which the school board debated proposed changes to its policies in treatment of transgender students. Cross said he would not use transgender students' pronouns.

School boards across the state have been revising their policies to be more inclusive of transgender students in accordance with a new state law. But Loudoun County, outside the nation's capital, has been a particular flashpoint in the debate over not just transgender students but also how students learn about racism and race relations.

The school system said it suspended Cross in part because his comments caused a disruption at the school. But the lower court judge, James Plowman, and the state Supreme Court agreed that the handful of calls fielded by school administrators did not cause the type of disruption that warranted a suspension.

Tuesday's ruling leaves in place a temporary injunction that bars the school system from suspending Cross. A trial is scheduled for next week in Loudoun County to settle the issue permanently.

Since Cross filed his lawsuit in May, two additional teachers in Loudoun County have joined him as plaintiffs.

In this April 30, 2021, file photo, Florida Gov.Ron DeSantis speaks at 

the end of a legislative session at the Capitol in Tallahassee, Fla.

Wilfredo Lee/AP

On The First Day Of Pride Month, Florida Signed A Transgender Athlete Bill Into Law
June 2, 2021, AP

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida's Republican governor signed a bill Tuesday barring transgender females from playing on public school teams intended for student athletes born as girls, plunging the state into the national culture war over transgender rights.

"In Florida, girls are going to play girls sports and boys are going to play boys sports," Gov. Ron DeSantis said as he signed the bill into law at a private Christian academy in Jacksonville that would not be subject to the law. "We're going to make sure that that's the reality."

The new law, sure to be challenged as unconstitutional, inflames an already contentious discussion unfolding nationally as Republican-controlled states move to limit the rights of LGBTQ people, whose advocates were particularly annoyed that the legislation was signed on the first day of Gay Pride Month.

The NCAA, which oversees college athletics, has said it has "a long-standing policy that provides a more inclusive path for transgender participation in college sports." The NCAA currently requires transgender women to get treatment to lower their testosterone levels before they can compete in women's sports.

When the Florida Legislature was considering the measure in April, the NCAA said it would commit championship games to "locations where hosts can commit to providing an environment that is safe, healthy and free of discrimination."

High-profile athletic events, such as football bowl games and basketball tournaments, generate millions of dollars for local communities.

The measure approved by the GOP-led Legislature takes effect July 1. It says a transgender student athlete can't participate without first showing a birth certificate saying she was a girl when she was born. It's not clear whether all females must show their birth certificates, or only those whose gender is questioned. The proposal allows another student to sue if a school allows a transgender girl or woman to play on a team intended for biological females.

The final wording of the "Fairness in Women's Sports Act" stripped away some of its most contentious elements, including a requirement that transgender athletes in high schools and colleges undergo testosterone or genetic testing and submit to having their genitalia examined.

But the legislation signed by the governor advances an underlying principle asserted by supporters: Biological differences between males and females make it unfair for athletes identified as boys at birth to compete on teams for girls and women. The law would not bar female athletes from playing on boys' or men's teams.

Human Rights Campaign President Alphonso David said the new law would not only harm transgender girls. "All Floridians will have to face the consequences of this anti-transgender legislation — including economic harm, expensive taxpayer-funded legal battles, and a tarnished reputation."

Democrats and LGBTQ advocates said the law is discriminatory and will be challenged in court as unconstitutional.

"This is yet another hate-driven attack from the governor and Republican legislators, and it's insulting that they've staged this morning's photo-op on the first day of Pride Month," said state Sen. Shevrin Jones. "At the end of the day, transgender kids are just kids."

The ban was tucked at the last minute of the legislative session into a measure allowing public universities and colleges to sponsor charter schools — a point the governor did not mention during the bill signing. It was the transgender athletes provision that was front and center in Tuesday's rhetoric.

"This bill is very simply about making sure that women can safely compete, have opportunities and physically be able to excel in a sport that they trained for, prepared for and work for," said state Sen. Kelli Stargel, a Republican who championed the bill.

"This is nothing about anybody being discriminated against," she said. "It's solely so that women have an opportunity to compete in women's sports."

The Florida law mirrors an Idaho law, the first of its kind when enacted last year, that is now mired in legal challenges. GOP governors in Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee recently signed similar measures.

Efforts by conservatives to restrict rights of gay, lesbian and transgender people have spawned numerous battles in key arenas — not only in legislatures and courtrooms but also across the economy, and critics warned of looming consequences.

According to a 2017 Associated Press study, North Carolina stood to lose $3.8 billion over a dozen years because of a so-called "bathroom bill." Those losses were averted when a 2019 settlement kept the state from barring transgender people from using bathrooms that conformed to their gender identity.

"Let me say very clearly: In Florida, we're going to do what's right to stand up to corporations, they are not going to dictate the policies in this state," DeSantis said while flanked by students at the religious school. "We will stand up to groups like the NCAA who think that they should be able to dictate the policies in different states. Not here, not ever."

A Connecticut track athlete, Selina Soule, joined the Florida governor at the news conference to talk about how she failed to advance in competitions because she competed against transgender athletes. She called it unfair.

That Soule was from out of state was not lost on critics who contend that the matter was not an urgent one for Florida, noting that just 11 athletes applied for screening by the Florida High School Athletic Association since adopting its transgender participation policy in 2013.

"This is not out of need or necessity," said Orlando Gonzales, the executive director of SAVE, a South Florida gay rights advocacy group, during a news conference. "This is really just to throw red meat out there to really rally the base of people who are anti-LGBT."

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Hemstead Schools Superintendent Blew The Whistle on Corruption, Was Fired, Sued. The Supreme Court Declined To Hear His Case

Hempstead Long Island N.Y. Schools Superintendent Shimon Waronker. 
Credit: Jeffrey Basinger, Newsday
Many readers, like myself, of the case of Shimon Waronker believe that the decision of the Supreme Court is a denial of free speech under the First Amendment.
Leagle.com:




Summary:
The case detailed below involves Shimon Waronker, the superintendent of the Hempstead Union Free School District on Long Island. He was hired in 2017 to reform a district plagued by academic difficulties and corruption, court papers say. 

Waronker hired investigators and a forensic accounting firm to root out corruption in the district, and he reported some findings to law enforcement. The school board placed him on administrative leave without pay in January 2018.

Waronker sued, alleging violations of his First Amendment free speech rights, 14th Amendment due-process rights, and of state whistleblower laws. He lost in a federal district court and in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, in New York City, which both held that the superintendent's speech about school operations was part of his official duties and thus not protected under the First Amendment.
Supreme Court Declines Superintendent's Case on Reporting Corruption
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the appeal of a school superintendent in New York state who alleges he was fired for reporting corruption in his new district to law enforcement as he was required to do.
Also, over the dissent of two justices, the high court also declined to hear the case of an individual who was blocked from suing the U.S. Department of Education for alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
The actions came on a busy day of orders and opinions for the court, which is soldiering on with its docket amid the contstraints of the coronavirus pandemic. The court has set May 11 as the date it will hear telephone arguments in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (Case No. 19-267), about whether religious schools are exempt from civil rights laws for employment decisions involving lay teachers.
The denial in the New York state case involved Shimon Waronker, who was hired as the superintendent of the Hempstead Union Free School District on Long Island in 2017 to reform a district plagued by academic difficulties and corruption, court papers say.
Waronker hired investigators and a forensic accounting firm to root out corruption in the district, and he reported some findings to law enforcement. The school board placed him on administrative leave without pay in January 2018.
Waronker sued, alleging violations of his First Amendment free speech rights, 14th Amendment due-process rights, and of state whistleblower laws. He lost in a federal district court and in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, in New York City, which both held that the superintendent's speech about school operations was part of his official duties and thus not protected under the First Amendment.
The former superintendent's appeal in Waronker v. Hempstead Union Free School District (No. 19-893) argued that the 2nd Circuit's decision conflicted with a 2014 Supreme Court ruling, Lane v. Franks , which held that a public employee's truthful testimony in court subject to a subpoena was protected speech.
"Waronker was obligated by law to expose the corruption he saw in his school district," says the former superintendent's brief. "If a superintendent of schools sees illegal corruption and does not report it to law enforcement, he has breached his fiduciary duty and may well be an accessory after the fact."
The school district, in a brief urging the court not to take up the case, said that part of the superintendent's job duties were to communicate with outside agencies, and that his communications were not like the compelled testimony at issue in Lane.
"This case is a poor vehicle to provide more general guidance on the question of when speech that exposes corruption may be protected by the First Amendment," the district's brief said.
The justices declined Waronker's appeal without comment.

Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru

Consolidated with:
Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
19-2679th Cir.May 11, 2020
Tr.Aud.
TBDTBDTBDOT 2019
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether the First Amendment's religion clauses prevent civil courts from adjudicating employment-discrimination claims brought by an employee against her religious employer, when the employee carried out important religious functions.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jul 18 2019Application (19A80) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 29, 2019 to August 28, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Jul 19 2019Application (19A80) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 28, 2019.
Aug 28 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 30, 2019)
Sep 11 2019Brief amicus curiae of The National Catholic Educational Association filed.
Sep 26 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 30, 2019 to October 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Sep 27 2019Brief amici curiae of Professors Douglas Laycock, et al. filed.
Sep 27 2019Brief amici curiae of Church of God in Christ, Inc. and Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America filed. VIDED
Sep 27 2019Brief amici curiae of State of Alaska, et al. filed.
Sep 30 2019Brief amici curiae of The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, et al. filed.
Sep 30 2019Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society et al. filed.
Sep 30 2019Brief amici curiae of General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, et al. filed.
Sep 30 2019Brief amicus curiae of Stephen Wise Temple filed.
Sep 30 2019Brief amicus curiae of National Legal Foundation filed.
Oct 01 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 18, 2019.
Oct 17 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2019 to October 28, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 18 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 28, 2019.
Oct 28 2019Brief of respondent Agnes Morrissey-Berru in opposition filed.
Oct 28 2019Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under 15.5 filed.
Oct 30 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
Nov 01 2019Reply of petitioner Our Lady of Guadalupe School filed. (Distributed)
Nov 12 2019Rescheduled.
Nov 26 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
Dec 18 2019Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-348 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
Dec 18 2019Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-267. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-267. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
Jan 27 2020Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Our Lady of Guadalupe School. VIDED
Jan 31 2020SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 1, 2020. VIDED
Feb 03 2020Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.) VIDED
Feb 03 2020Brief of petitioner Our Lady of Guadalupe School filed. VIDED
Feb 06 2020Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed. VIDED.
Feb 07 2020Brief amici curiae of The Christian and Missionary Alliance, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 07 2020Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed. VIDED.
Feb 07 2020Brief amici curiae of COLPA, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 07 2020Brief amici curiae of State of Alaska, et al. filed (in 19-267).
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA, World Vision Inc., Young Life filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of National Catholic Educational Association filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Church of God in Christ, Inc. and Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Torah Umesorah filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Franciscan University of Steubenville filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists and Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Asma T. Uddin filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Independent Women's Law Center filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Partnership Schools filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Stephen Wise Temple and Milwaukee Jewish Day School filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Columbia International University and Sixth Mount Zion Missionary Baptist Church filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Professor John D. Inazu filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of The Association of Classical Christian Schools, et al., filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Senator Mike Lee, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Ethics and Public Policy Center filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of Inner Life Fund filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of American Jewish Committee and United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of First Liberty Institute filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Council for Christian Colleges and Universities and Forty Individual Religious Colleges and Universities filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Billy Graham Evangelical Association, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amici curiae of Professors Douglas Laycock, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 10 2020Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Feb 19 2020CIRCULATED
Feb 19 2020Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
Mar 04 2020Brief of respondents filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 04 2020The record of the USCA 9th Circuit is available on Pacer.
Mar 10 2020Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.
Mar 10 2020Brief amici curiae of The Freedom From Religion Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 11 2020Brief amici curiae of Center for Inquiry, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 11 2020Brief amici curiae of National Women's Law Center, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 11 2020Motion of Virginia, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.
Mar 11 2020Brief amici curiae of Virginia, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 11 2020Brief amici curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 11 2020Brief amici curiae of Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice and Bet Tzedek filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 11 2020Brief amici curiae of CHILD USA, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 16 2020ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED. VIDED.
Mar 23 2020Motion of Virginia, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument DENIED. VIDED.
Mar 23 2020Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. VIDED.
Apr 03 2020Reply of petitioners filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Apr 13 2020Argument to be rescheduled for May 2020.
Apr 15 2020RESCHEDULED FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, May 11, 2020. VIDED.
May 11 2020Argued. For petitioners: Eric C. Rassbach, Washington, D. C.; and Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.). For respondents: Jeffrey L. Fisher, Menlo Park, Cal. VIDED.