The Impeachment Of Governor Andrew Cuomo Goes Nowhere - No Surprises Here

 

Speaker Carl Heastie and Gov. Andrew Cuomo

In New York State, did anyone really believe that Governor Andrew Cuomo, son of former Gov. Mario Cuomo, would be held accountable for any of his actions, including sexual harassment of women who worked for him?

Reporter who covered Cuomo for years recounts governor's 'checkered, bullying, spiteful' past

Nope.

 Betsy Combier

Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ blog
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

Even the impeachment of Gov. Cuomo is just grist for corruption

NY POST Editorial Board, May 31, 2021

The charges against Gov. Andrew Cuomo won’t be real until Speaker Carl Heastie says they are.

Assemblyman Charles Lavine, who’s nominally in charge of the supposed Cuomo impeachment inquiry, admitted last week that there’s no end anywhere in sight. Nor will there be, until Speaker Carl Heastie decides he wants it.

At just the third Judiciary Committee meeting to even pretend to address the issue since the ball supposedly started rolling in March, Lavine merely announced that the $250,000 for outside lawyers at Davis Polk & Wardwell is just the start; the Assembly will spend as much “as needed” on its investigation.

Meanwhile, The Post’s Bernadette Hogan reported that Heastie dutifully played middleman when Gov. Andrew Cuomo wanted Assemblyman Ron Kim to walk back his truth-telling about the admission by top Cuomo aide Melissa DeRosa that Team Cuomo had intentionally kept legislators in the dark about the true COVID death toll in state nursing homes.

At the gov’s behest, Heastie had an aide “relay” Cuomo’s request that Kim deny what he’d already told the press. “I came to the conclusion that if I put out this statement, that I would be complicit in the coverup,” Kim told The Post.

And Heastie had his staff convey that invitation to help deceive the public, not the first time he’s had staff relay the gov’s threats.

So it stands to reason the Assembly’s impeachment probe won’t get very far until Cuomo tells Heastie it’s time to wrap it up. And, sadly, all Cuomo has to do in return is let the speaker have his way with public policy — the public interest be damned.

Pretty sordid, isn’t it, that even the effort to hold a governor to account for horrific abuse of his office is just grist for another corrupt bargain?

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio and His "Pay To Play" Policy

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is, it seems, very interested in you if you have the money to give him to pay for any favors. It's called "Pay to Play".

Or "corruption".

Call it whatever you want, it is still not the way to rule or lead.

Betsy Combier, betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials 

Lobbyists made $113M in 2019 wooing NYC City Hall, Council, report says

by Carl Campanile, NY POST, March 1, 2020

Well-connected lobbyists made a killing in 2019 wooing City Hall and the City Council on an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink list of issues, raking in a cumulative $113.19 million, according to a new report by the City Clerk.

That eye-popping total represents a 10-percent hike from what the scale-tippers pulled down in 2018, underscoring just how loudly money talks in the political arena, watchdogs said.

“The increase in spending shows the well-heeled can spend for a megaphone compared to the average New Yorker, who speaks with a whisper,” said Blair Horner, of the New York Public Interest Research Group.

“It must be working or they wouldn’t be spending more dough on lobbying.”

Tops on the list for the third year running was Suri Kasirer’s firm, Kasirer LLC, which pocketed $14.3 million from its more than 200 clients, the report found.

Her sizable stable includes: PETA, which seeks better treatment for carriage horses and backs a proposed ban on furs; Tobacco Free Kids and the Cancer Society, which supported a ban on flavored e-cigarettes; NY1 owner Charter Communications, whose franchise needs to be renewed by the city; Uber, which is fighting city proposals to cap trips; and the consortium that sought to redevelop the area in Long Island City for the aborted Amazon campus.

“It’s not my first rodeo,” said Kasirer, who has built inroads with Mayor Bill de Blasio — plus Mayors Michael Bloomberg and Rudy Giuliani before him — as well as City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, who is widely considered a frontrunner to become the city’s next mayor.

“You have to build coalitions in both the council and the administration.”

The second-highest compensated firm was James Capalino & Associates, which earned $11.9 million in 2019.

Like Kasirer, Capalino also has decades-long ties to de Blasio and others in city government, and a diverse roster of clients that includes the Staten Island Mall, the Archdiocese of New York, vaping giant Juul Labs, Macy’s, New York University, UPS and more.

One of Kasirer’s clients, the pro-animal rights, anti-horse carriage group New Yorkers for Clean, Livable and Safe Streets — or NYCLASS — agreed in 2018 to pay state run-watchdog the Joint Commission on Public Ethics a $10,000 fine to settle allegations of lobbying-act violations after donating $75,000 to the Campaign for One New York, a de Blasio-controlled advocacy group.

In the same year, Capalino paid a $40,000 fine to JCOPE to settle accusations of lobbying violations, admitting he personally contributed $10,000 to de Blasio’s CONY and secured another $90,000 in contributions from nine clients who retained him to lobby the city, the mayor and his senior staff.

The Bolton – St. John’s firm came in a distant third in the city clerk’s report, earning $5.6 million in 2019.

With respect to outgoing funds, the parent company of RJ Reynolds Tobacco — RAI Services — had the biggest lobbying stable, paying seven different firms in its fight against legislation to ban menthol cigarettes.

But real estate and development remains the bread and butter of the lobbying industry, accounting for 40 percent of all compensation, the report noted.

The developer of a project to build a 13-tower mixed-use project along Flushing Creek in Queens — the FWRA consortium — paid over $1 million in lobbying bills as it seeks to win city approval to rezone the area, the most paid by any one client last year.

Capalino is one of the consortium’s lobbyists.

“It begs the question of whether the public interest is being served or whether special interests have too much influence by hiring experts,” said Alexander Camarda, of watchdog group Reinvent Albany.

While his since-disbanded CONY group was under investigation, de Blasio said he would restrict directly meeting with lobbyists, a stance that City Hall said he maintains.

“The mayor does not meet with any lobbyists-for-hire,” said mayoral spokeswoman Freddi Goldstein.

Johnson — who has publicly said that he would reject special-interest money in his City Hall run — declined comment.

Additional reporting by Rich Calder and Aaron Feis

Developer paid de Blasio-linked lobbyist, lawyers for East Village petition

by Julia Marsh, NYPOST, January 24, 2020

A developer paid an ethically tarred City Hall lobbyist — and the law firm that defended Mayor Bill de Blasio against pay-to-play allegations — to press the administration for permission to expand a 10-story office tower in the East Village, The Post has learned.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission, whose 11 members are all mayoral appointees, approved plans by Real Estate Equities Corp. to enlarge a building at 3 St. Marks Place that’s 20% larger than limits allowed by the area’s current zoning laws.

The plan was approved in June — although the $200,000 the developer paid to de Blasio lobbyist James Capalino and the law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP — were not reported in the press.

Capalino paid a $40,000 settlement to a state ethics watchdog in 2018 for improper contributions to de Blasio’s since-shuttered Campaign for One New York. Meanwhile, the mayor still owes Kramer Levin $300,000 for defending him against pay-to-play allegations.

The project began the city’s lengthy land review process known as ULURP last month. The plan was voted down at its first review point, the local community board, which said it would “not be harmonious with the character of the neighborhood.” It’s still awaiting a public hearing and vote by the City Planning Commission, a specific target of the lobbyists according to city records.

“This administration makes decisions based on the facts and nothing else,” said City Hall spokeswoman Jane Meyer.

Andrew Berman, director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, was skeptical of Meyer’s claim.

“Anyone who thinks this administration makes these decisions purely on the merits is simply burying their head in the sand,” Berman said.

“When lobbyists to whom the mayor is personally indebted and from whom he has received thousands in contributions are behind a project, you know you’re in trouble. This plan to increase the size of an office building on St. Marks Place by 20% is wrong from every angle,” Berman said.

Local resident Carolyn Ratcliffe called the process “very suspect.”

“I think that if de Blasio owes the law firm $300,000 that it’s sort of like a very smelly mackerel. You know most people would say that’s a conflict of interest,” Ratcliffe said.

The project’s fate depends local councilwoman Carlina Rivera, who has reservations about the building’s scale.

“I continue to share the same concerns that many in our community have brought up, including Community Board 3, regarding this project and its impact on the surrounding area, and I have not seen anything new presented that would make me consider it favorably as it proceeds through ULURP,” Rivera told The Post.

Capalino attorney Kenneth Fisher dismissed any conflicts of interest questions as “smoke and mirrors to cover the fact that the opponent doesn’t have good arguments on the merits.”

Reps for Kramer Levin and Real Estate Equities Corp. did not return messages.

Former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, in Federal Court, Testifies That He Needed To Help His Son Adam

Former State Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos leaves Manhattan Federal Court during his retrial on
extortion and bribery charges on Friday. (Jefferson Siegel / New York Daily News)

Dean Skelos, formerly one of the most powerful men in Albany, testified in his defense in the corruption case currently unfolding in Federal Court. He says he was a good dad, only trying to help his troubled son Adam.

We all want to help our kids. But using threats and a public office to make sure that someone obeys is another matter.

Put father and son in jail for a long time. Teach other politicos a lesson in dealing with private matters while in public office.

That is my two cents.

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
betsy@advocatz.com
ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

Disgraced pol Dean Skelos testifies in federal trial he was just trying to help troubled son

By MOLLY CRANE-NEWMAN and JANON FISHER, NY DAILY NEWS

JUL 06, 2018

He was a good dad with a bad son.

Former state Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos took the witness stand Friday at his federal corruption retrial to admit, yes, he pulled a few strings for his ne’er-do-well son — but no favorable legislation was advanced in exchange.

The former Albany bigwig, who’s accused of soliciting bribes and extorting businesses to employ his slacker son, Adam, explained what he did for the love of his kid.
“Quite frankly, I’ve asked a lot of people to help my son,” he said. “If I had the opportunity to ask (somebody) to help Adam, I would.”

But the disgraced ex pol said he never threatened or intimidated anyone for the favors, almost laughing off the insinuation under questioning.

The Long Island Republican — once one of the three powerful men who decided how the state budget would be spent — told the court about his decades-long political career, his son’s behavioral problems from a young age and their close-knit father and son relationship. Skelos cut a confident figure, wearing a beige suit and a blue tie, and cracking more than one joke during his testimony.

The fallen legislator said he and his adopted son, 35, had a impenetrable bond from the get-go, which he partially attributed to his wife leaving in 1982.

“(Life circumstances) changed — number one, I lost my election,” he said. “But also the marriage did not work out, and for a while, I was the primary caregiver of Adam.”

Skelos, 70, said he would take his baby boy to political events, even holding him up on stage when he gave speeches. Offstage, Adam Skelos grew up struggling in school and with behavioral problems, he said.

“We would discuss school. We would discuss our personal lives. Adam had certain issues he was dealing with,” Skelos said. When the boy was 7 or 8, his dad enrolled him in special-education classes for reading and language, where he remained for four or five years. Skelos said he tried to be a positive force in his son’s life, telling him, “Move forward — have confidence in yourself, do the right thing.”

By the time Adam Skelos reached his early 20s, drug and alcohol addiction became a bigger issue.

“What I would always try to do is manage him through those issues,” he said. “There’s nothing more important than being a parent.”

Skelos didn’t shy away from talking about his son’s temper.

“His temperament, sometimes he could get a bit abrasive,” he said. “It could get a little ugly.”

For all his close parenting, Skelos wasn’t able to instill a strong work ethic in his son.

Anthony Bonomo, a medical malpractice CEO who hired Adam Skelos at his father’s request, complained about the son not coming to work.

“He called me and indicated that Adam was not performing well — that he wasn’t showing up the way he felt he should,” the former senator told the court.

Instead of addressing it himself, Skelos said he kicked the problem back to Bonomo, who he said had been a friend for 30 years. He told the insurance executive, “If there’s any way you could remediate the problem, it would be nice.”

His lawyer, Robert Gage asked about his tone.

“Certainly not threatening,” he said. “I think what he heard was my frustration with Adam.”

Adam Skelos, center

Another NYPD Official "Retires" From NYC Corruption

Bill De Blasio's legacy will be:  the Most Corrupt Mayor since William Magear (“Boss”) Tweed, the “Tiger of Tammany,” 

Boss Tweed

Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, Mayor De Blasio, Michael Harrington

Third High-Ranking NYPD Official Files for Retirement Amid Corruption Probe

LINK

NEW YORK CITY — A third high ranking NYPD official has filed for retirement amid the federal corruption investigation into a pay-for-favors scandal in the nation's largest police force, DNAinfo New York has learned.

Deputy Chief Michael Harrington, who was stripped of his badge and gun nearly two months ago, handed in his papers at Police Headquarters on Thursday, sources said.

The three-decade veteran, who was second in command in the NYPD’s citywide housing bureau, is the third top commander this week to leave the NYPD since Commissioner Bill Bratton said he expected arrests in the probe.

Harrington, who comes from a long line of respected officers, served previously as the right hand man for then-Chief of Department Philip Banks, who was the initial target of the now 2 1/2-year federal investigation.

Under city regulations, officers who retire are guaranteed their respective pensions even if they are arrested and convicted of a felony. Commissioner Bratton has 30 days to file charges against an officer, if warranted, that would halt their departure until the charges are resolved.

Banks, who has not been charged with any crime, took trips and junkets with two wealthy businessmen, Jona Rechnitz and Jeremy Reichberg, who served on Mayor de Blasio’s Inauguration Committee. 

The federal investigation of the NYPD centers on allegations that police officials took gifts in exchange for favors. The probe has also expanded to City Hall, where top mayoral advisers are being eyed over how they raised funds for various de Blasio political agendas.

Roy Richter, president of the Captain’s Endowment Association, declined to comment.

Deputy Chief David Colon, a 30-year veteran, filed for retirement on Wednesday, a day after Deputy Inspector James Grant pulled the plug on his career just shy of his 20th anniversary in the department.

Colon was known to hang out in the now-shuttered Harlem restaurant Hudson River Café, which was owned by Hamlet Peralta, a suspected con man recently arrested by the feds for operating a $12 million Ponzi scheme linked to the corruption scandal.

READ MORE: How Everyone is Connected in the City Hall/NYPD Corruption Probe

Deputy Inspector James Grant, who had served as the commander of the Upper East Side's 19th Precinct before his name surfaced in the scandal, is suspected of taking discounted jewelry and a trip to Las Vegas on a private jet from the two businessmen in exchange for police escorts.

Police officials said this week that they can't prevent individuals from retiring. However, they were able to reject a retirement application from Detective Michael Milici, who served as the Community Affairs officer at the 66th Precinct in Borough, because he took the Fifth when approached by the FBI — a violation of departmental policy.

Milci, who had more than 20 years on the force, was instead fired by Commissioner Bratton. But because of his tenure he is allowed to collect his full pension.

As many as another 10 officers — mostly high level officials — have been caught up in the federal probe, including two in the License Division who are suspected of taking money in exchange for gun permits without proper background checks.

Corrupt Politics May Survive Because the Corrupt Politicians Are Not Acting "Officially"

Mayor Bill has got to go. Now, soon. whatever.

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice

Bill DeBlasio

Supreme Court making it even harder to convict corrupt politicians

By Nicole Gelinas

LINK
Tired of New York’s pay-to-play politics?

Hoping that federal prosecutor

Preet Bharara

Preet Bharara will throw Mayor de Blasio in prison along with, soon, former state lawmakers Sheldon Silver and Dean Skelos?

Keep hoping. The Supreme Court could make it harder to secure corruption convictions — meaning we’ll have to kick dirty pols out at the ballot box, rather than wait for arrests.

Federal law is clear: A politician can’t take a donor’s money and promise something in return.

Bill de Blasio can’t take money from people who want to ban the horse carriages — and promise to ban the horse carriages in return.

Nor can he take money from people who don’t want to ban helicopter tours — and then protect the tours in return.

So why might the mayor skate when it comes to any pay-for-play shenanigans?

The key is the “in return” part.

The Supreme Court has long prohibited prosecutors from using timing as evidence: Jurors must believe it is just coincidence if a candidate gets a donation one day and does something for the donor the next.

Prosecutors need evidence of an explicit deal, and few politicians are dumb enough to have such a deal.

Now, the Supreme Court could make it even harder for prosecutors to prove a quid pro quo. Under a possible new reading of the law, politicians would be able to make explicit deals with donors — as long as they don’t act “officially.”

The case in question is federal prosecutors’ conviction two years ago of then-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

McDonnell received a prison sentence for taking $177,000 in plane trips, Louis Vuitton and Oscar de la Renta clothes, iPhones, a wedding for his daughter and a Rolex, all from a man, Jonnie Williams, who wanted the governor to promote his diet pill.

The jury was careful — it acquitted the governor on three counts. But jurors could see the obvious: No politician can take that much money and not know he is being bribed.

Still, McDonnell has a great lawyer, Noel Francisco — who convinced the Supreme Court to take the case.

Last Wednesday, the court heard a novel argument: McDonnell can’t be convicted of bribery, because the things he did for Williams were not “official acts.”

That is, when McDonnell asked researchers at the state University of Virginia to promote Williams’ drug supplements, he wasn’t acting as governor. He was just acting as any regular person, exercising free speech.

As Justice Elena Kagan observed of one of the governor’s techniques, “so that’s essentially hosting a party and allowing Mr. Williams to invite some people . . . Why is that an official act?”

Sure. We all have parties in our homes.

Except: The governor has parties in the Governor’s Mansion — not something anyone can do.

And, as Justice Department lawyer Michael Dreeben noted before the court, the guests from the university weren’t exactly there voluntarily.

The governor appoints the university’s board members. “He sets the budget,” Dreeben noted. “They know that he’s an important guy . . . The governor is taking every step he can” to signal to university folk to support this diet drug.

When you’re the governor, everything you do in public is an official act.

If corruption is only when you take direct action to help a donor, it will be difficult to secure corruption convictions.

A change in the law would affect New York’s recent cases — and chances for future convictions.

Take former state Senate leader Dean Skelos, convicted of bribery in December. US Attorney Bharara’s conviction of Skelos wasn’t mostly based on “official acts,” under the definition the court is considering.

Skelos convinced Long Island officials to help a company that employed his son, in return for that employment. But Skelos had no legal authority over those Long Island officials. Anyone can ask government officials for help.

The same is true with the mayor. Say prosecutors do find evidence of a deal between horse-carriage opponents and de Blasio. Any citizen can propose that the City Council consider a bill to ban horse carriages — just as any citizen can encourage regulators to look favorably upon helicopters.

(Silver’s conviction is more secure. Then again, it took two decades to catch the guy.)

No matter what the Supreme Court rules, we shouldn’t rely on the justice system to govern our politicians.

De Blasio doesn’t have to be found legally corrupt for the voters to think he is corrupt.

As long as he’s out of office, it doesn’t matter if he’s out of prison, too.

Nicole Gelinas is a contributing editor to the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal.

THE DEATH OF SUNNY SHEU: UPDATE

Sunny Sheu

THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATION, NYPD INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND THE NYPD DETECTIVE BUREAU CONTINUE THE COVER UP

LINK
Pre-Publication Fact Check Request to Mayor De Blasio, DOI Commissioner Mark Peters, and Inspector General Philip Eure

After Sunny Sheu's death on June 26^th, 2010, the Blackstar News repeatedly sent certified letters informing Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner Kelly of the case and demanding an investigation.  Despite proof of receipt, none of these letters was ever acknowledged or responded to by Bloomberg or Kelly. Similar letters were sent to NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio and Commissioner William J. Bratton, which were likewise ignored.

The BSN letter ignored by the Mayor's office and NYPD Commissioners included allegations and evidence of many felonies by numerous agents of the NYPD - all relating to the death of Mr. Sheu - including illegal detention, illegal search and seizure, death threats, illegal removal of a body from a hospital, providing false evidence the Medical Examiner and potential complicity in a murder. Most significantly, the letter alerted the Mayor and Commissioner that the NYPD had failed to investigate a death ruled as “undetermined” by the Medical Examiner, as they are obligated to do.

By refusing to investigate thoroughly documented allegations of crimes by his subordinates, and failing to enforce laws violated by them, the NYPD Commissioner effectively became complicit in these acts, establishing them as systemic corruption in the NYPD.

NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATION: “NEW YORK CITY'S WATCHDOG”
In either case; that of corruption of individual city employees, or systemic corruption in a government agency, the “watchdog agency” over corruption in the New York City government is the NY Department of Investigation (DOI).  According to their website: “[DOI] Investigations may involve any agency, officer, elected official or employee of the City... As New York City's watchdog, DOI's strategy attacks corruption comprehensively through systemic investigations that lead to high-impact arrests, preventive controls and operational reforms that improve the way the City runs.”

So it was the DOI that the BSN contacted in May 2014, to report corruption by NYPD officers, and systemic corruption in the NYPD as an institution. BSN's initial contact at the DOI was Lee Contes, Assistant to DOI Chief Investigator John Kantor. [Kantor was also known as “Assistant Commissioner” of the DOI] In an email to Contes of May 12, 2014, the BSN described the mortgage fraud, illegal detention and death threats by NYPD Detectives, Sheu's suspicious death and the ongoing cover up. A follow up letter, dated May 16, stressed that the complaint was against the NYPD, and further enumerated the specific complaints against the NYPD.

Contes replied that he would forward the case to DOI Chief of Investigations, John Kantor and that we would be hearing back from Kantor “within a day or two”.  Interestingly, Kantor formerly held a high-level position at the famously corrupt NY Department of Buildings during the period when Judge Golia's brother, James Golia, was the Assistant Commissioner.   

Three weeks passed and Kantor never responded. On May 30^th, the BSN wrote directly to Kantor, making it clear that if we did not hear from him by the end of the day, we would be reporting the case, and the DOI's delinquency, to Mayor De Blasio.
DOI CHIEF OF INVESTIGATIONS JOHN KANTOR TRANSFERS THE CASE TO EDDIE LEBRON OF THE NYPD / DOI SQUAD

Kantor responded the same day, confirming receipt of the email to Contes, and promising to review the complaint. The following Monday, Kantor confirmed that the DOI had initiated an investigation: “DOI has thoroughly reviewed the information that you have provided to Mr. Contes as well as the further information that is available on your website regarding the death of Mr. Sheu...Going forward, your contact should be Detective Eddie Lebron of DOI’s NYPD Squad.”

Immediately thereafter, Galison contacted Lebron by phone and then by email, and requested that he and Milton Allimadi, two of the primary sources in the Sheu case, and the possessors of key documentation, be interviewed in person by Lebron.

DETECTIVE EDDIE LEBRON OF THE NYPD/DOI SQUAD CONFIRMS THAT THE DOI IS INVESTIGATING THE CASE

Lebron Contacted the BSN on June 12^th, confirming that a DOI investigation of the Sheu case was underway: “The NYC Department of Investigation ( DOI ) is currently conducting an investigation into this matter. I am not able to meet with you in person at this time. I understand your desire to assist in this process but certain investigative steps must be completed, before anyone at DOI speaks with you. Please feel free to call me or correspond by email with any documentation or information that could assist in this investigation.”

BSN received no further communication from the DOI or the NYPD/DOI Squad after this letter. No requests for information, no updates, and no invitation to an interview. In fact, the DOI failed to respond to numerous emails sent to them by the BSN requesting a follow up report.

BSN tried many times to contact Lebron at the NYPD/DOI Squad by phone but we either kept on hold indefinitely,  told we would be called back and then forgotten. When BSN finally managed to connect with Lebron, on July 1, 2014, he refused to provide any information about the status of the case, but confirmed 13 times in that conversation that the DOI was investigating the case, and that he was the sole contact person for the Blackstar News. In our final conversation, Lebron assured the BSN that we would be contacted after certain preliminary steps were taken, but we were never contacted again.

“THE NYPD DOI SQUAD” IS NOT PART OF THE DOI AND IS FORBIDDEN FROM INVESTIGATING THE NYPD OR AIDING THE OIG/NYPD. THEIR “INVESTIGATION” WAS A FRAUD.

There is a very good reason why the NYPD/DOI Squad never got back to BSN. It turns out that the NYPD/DOI Squad is simply an NYPD detective squad, and as such has no jurisdiction over cases involving misconduct or criminality by NYPD personnel. The only agencies in the NYPD with such jurisdiction are the Bureau of Internal Affairs (IAB) and the Chief of Detective's Bureau

The Role of the NYPD/DOI Squad

The sole function of the NYPD/DOI Squad is to aid investigations at the request of one of the various Inspector Generals within the DOI, except for Office of Inspector General for NYPD Affairs, OIG/NYPD, whom they are expressly prohibited to assist, due to obvious conflict of interest. A detective from the NYPD/DOI Squad who requested anonymity stated: “We have nothing to do the OIG/NYPD part of it.. apparently they investigate us, the NYPD, I guess policies and procedures and stuff like that. So we don't work with them, because basically they're investigating us”.

 Thomas Mahoney, Chief of investigations for the Office of the Inspector General for the NYPD also confirmed this, stating: “the DOI/NYPD never handled complaints about the police department”.THE NYPD/DOI  SQUAD “INVESTIGATION” CITED BY LEBRON NEVER HAPPENED
As explained, the NYPD/DOI Squad is not part of the DOI. The only Inspector General in the DOI authorized to investigate the NYPD is the OIG/NYPD, which confirmed that they had no knowledge of the Sheu case before July 19, 2014. So Lebron's statement of June 12, that the “The NYC Department of Investigation ( DOI ) is currently conducting an investigation” is patently false.  There was no investigation by the DOI; and all of Lebron's communications with the BSN were fraudulent, intended only to mislead the BSN into believing that the Sheu case was being investigated, when it was not; by anybody.

KANTOR ALSO LIED ABOUT THE DOI/NYPD SQUAD “INVESTIGATION”
On June 30, 2014, Kantor wrote: “DOI is continuing to obtain relevant records regarding Mr. Sheu’s death from several agencies. We have received some of the requested records, but we need to obtain further records


UPDATE: DOI CONFIRMS THAT NEITHER THE DOI NOR THE NYPD/DOI SQUAD EVER INVESTIGAED THE SHEU CASE
On December 22, 2015 the BSN filed a FOIL request with the DOI, demanding:
1) All documents pertaining in any way to the “review” mentioned by John Kantor in his email of June 30^th, 2014, including the “original documentation regarding Mr. Sheu’s death...” and

2) All documents pertaining in any way to the “investigation” by The NYC Department of Investigation mentioned in the below e-mail from Detective Lebron, including the investigation, number, status of case and names of the investigators involved”
In her response of December 29, 2015, Elyse Hirschorn, Chief Investigative Attorney for the DOI wrote: “Neither the Department of Investigation nor the [NYPD] Department of Investigation Squad ever investigated this matter.”
Hirschorn then attempted to bend the truth by continuing: “Rather, the issues you raised were forwarded to the Inspector General for the New York Police Department (“OIG/NYPD”) for appropriate action.”
In fact, neither DOI nor the NYPD/DOI transferred the case to the OIG. As explained below, the Sheu complaint was introduced to the OIG by the Blackstar News in a letter of July 19, 2014, and Inspector General Philip Eure and his deputy Sandra Musemeschi, both stated that they had never heard of the case or the name Sunny Sheu before being notified by the BSN.
KANTOR TRANSFERRED THE SHEU CASE TO AN AGENCY WITH NO JURISDICTION, AND BURIED IT.
DOI Assistant Commissioner Jon Kantor knew that the NYPD/DOI Squad is not part of the DOI and that it is forbidden from investigating on behalf of the NYPD/DOI.  Therefore; when he gave the case to the NYPD/DOI Squad, he was knowingly giving the case to an agency without jurisdiction, and removing it from the DOI's legitimate jurisdiction. He buried it.

KANTOR CONCEALED THE COMPLAINT FROM THE SOLE AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE CASE; THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL/ NYPD.
Had the Sunny Sheu complaint arrived at Kantor's desk before March 28, 2014, they may have had reason to refer the complaint to the NYPD, but only to the IAB or Detective's Squad, which were at that time the only city agencies with jurisdiction over NYPD misconduct. On that date however, in the wake of the IAB's mishandling of the Eric Garner scandal and amid great fanfare, Mayor De Blasio created a new agency within the DOI, specifically to investigate NYPD improprieties; the Office of the Inspector General for the NYPD (OIG/NYPD). After the creation of the OIG/NYPD, on May 28, 2014, any complaint to the DOI regarding the NYPD was referred directly to the OIG/NYPD.

On July 2, 2014. the BSN called the DOI for an update, and asked to speak to Lebron at the NYPD/DOI squad. The receptionist asked what the call regarded, and when told that it was a complaint against the NYPD, she responded: “the NYPD/DOI squad does not investigate complaints against the NYPD... that kind of thing is handled by the Office of the Inspector General for the NYPD”. Despite the BSN's insistence that the case had been investigated by the DOI/NYPD squad for over a month, the receptionist connected us to the OIG/NYPD.

Thus, after nearly two months of communication with the DOI, this receptionist was the first person at the DOI to mention the existence of the OIG to the BSN.

The BSN immediately wrote to Lebron, Kantor and Contes, demanding an explanation of why our complaint had been withheld from the OIG, and asking: “Have you or Mr. Kantor brought the Sunny Sheu case to the attention of Mr. Eure? ...” Lebron, Kantor and Contes never responded to this letter, and the BSN never heard from them again.

BSN Submits the Case to the Office Of The Inspector General for NYPD Affairs, Who Had Never Heard of the Case Previously
On July 19, 2014, the Blackstar News filed a formal complaint with the Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) This was in the form of a certified letter directly addressed to Philip Eure, the Inspector General for NYPD Affairs (“OIG/NYPD”) and his deputy, Sandra Musumechi, both of whom confirmed receipt.
Musumechi and Eure both stated, on the record, that prior to receiving the July 19^, letter, the OIG/NYPD had never received any information about the Sunny Sheu case, had never heard the name, and had never been contacted about it by NY DOI NYPD Squad. This confirms unequivocally that Lebron and the NYPD/DOI Squad had concealed the case and their “investigation” entirely from the OIG.

Eure Is Told of the Cover Up by the NYPD DOI Squad
The July 19, 2014 letter to Eure discussed not only the circumstances of Sheu's death and the ensuing cover up. It also emphasized the cover up by Lebron and the NYPD/DOI Squad, which, being part of the NYPD, is firmly under the OIG's jurisdiction.

Inspector General Philip Eure Continues the Cover Up.
When Inspector General Philip Eure was personally selected by DOI Commissioner Mark Peters to lead the Office of the Inspector General for NYPD, he was advertised as an  independent “outsider” with no loyalties to the NYPD, who would sweep the department clean without regard for entrenched power. Mayor De Blasio called Eure “One of the nation's premiere police accountability experts”.
The July 19 letter informs Eure, that a case involving possible complicity by the NYPD in a murder, which has been covered upby the NYPD, had been hijacked, buried and concealed from his agency by a corrupt NYPD agency (the NYPD/DOI), operating out of the very same building in which Eure was fighting NYPD corruption

Did Eure demand an investigation of the NYPD/DOI's role in covering up the case? Remarkably, Eure never responded to the July 19, 2014 letter, nor did he request any emails, phone recordings and other documentation of the NYPD/DOI’s phony investigation.  Indeed, to our knowledge, no branch of the DOI or any other law enforcement agency has ever investigated the cover up of the Sunny Sheu case by the NYPD/DOI Squad.

After many insistent follow up emails and calls by the BSN, however, Thomas Mahoney, Chief Investigator the Inspector General's office finally spoke to the BSN about the Sunny Sheu case, and finally consented to interview BSN Publisher Allimadi and reporter Galison.

The Office of the Inspector General Interviews Galison and Allimadi
On January 16th, at the DOI Headquarters, BSN met with OIG Investigator Edward Sanchez and Chief Investigator Joe Carhina. From the outset, it was clear that this would be “good cop/ bad cop” scenario, with Sanchez being obsequious to the point of annoyance, and Carinha being rude and dismissive to the point of aggression. Carinha even implied that Sheu had brought the illegal detention and death threats upon himself, by placing a note in the Judge's mailbox. with no concern for the raft of illegal acts involved with his detention and interrogation, not to mention his eventual death and the ensuing cover up
The BSN came prepared to answer questions clarifying and expanding upon on the evidence provided in the July 19  and accompanying documents.  For example, Allimadi was expecting to be asked to present his testimony that Dr. Ahmed had told him that “foul play” was involved in Sunny Sheu's death.  Allimadi's account is critically important to the case; if Ahmed was coerced into lying about the head trauma, then the people who coerced him were powerful enough to compel a doctor into committing a felony (accessory to murder after the fact), and interested in protecting the perpetrators.  Ahmed's confession of “foul play” is the key to the entire case, and should be of utmost concern to any honest investigator.

But Allimadi's account was immediately dismissed by the investigators as irrelevant. When Allimadi offered to sign a sworn affidavit and take a polygraph test to confirm his statement, Carinha objected that “lie detector tests are not allowed as evidence in a trial”.  The investigators ignored the fact that sworn affidavits are often presented as evidence in criminal cases, and a voluntary lie detector test may be certainly used as a basis for suspicion. Finally, when Galison asked if Ahmed would be questioned at all, Carinha replied “only if he chooses to come in...we can't force him”.
The OIG Neglects to Investigate The Key Questions of the Case

During the interview, in fact, neither Sanchez nor Carinha asked Allimadi or Galison a single question regarding the case. The only questions were asked by Allimadi and Galison, and while all the answers were vague and evasive, some revealed important clues as to the nature of the OIG's “investigation”, specifically, that the OIG:

- never subpoenaed the CAT scans made by ER Doctor Zeeshan Ahmed, who falsely told Sunny's friends and the NYPD that they showed no indication of head trauma. If the CAT scans showed unmistakable fractures to Sheu's skull (which they must), this would indicate that Ahmed knowingly allowed him to die without proper treatment.

- never investigated the disposition of Sheu's computer after his death or even inquired about its whereabouts. The computer would hold evidence of the NYPD's illegal surveillance of Sheu and hacking of his emails before his murder, which Sheu reported to the BSN and, under oath, to the FBI.

- never interviewed Dr. Zeeshan Ahmed, the ER Doctor who concealed Sheu's fatal head trauma and admitted to Allimadi that “foul play” was involved in Sheu’s death.

- never investigated the identity of the “witness” that the NYPD, in a fraudulent  memo, told the M.E. had seen Sheu fall, whose existence would exonerate the NYPD and whose non- existence would prove an NYPD conspiracy to mislead the M.E.
When reminded that all the 911 witnesses mentioned a man lying in the street and none mentioned a man falling down, Carhina replied: “Just because what you hear on 911, doesn't mean that later on when somebody was interviewed, that they may not add a little bit more...”
When reminded that there was no documentation of any interview with this alleged witness, no mention in the responding officer's notebook, no DD5, in fact none of the many mandatory official documents reflecting the existence of an interview, and that both Queens Assistant District Laura Weinstock and 109^th Pct. Detective Ardisano had told the BSN that there was no witness, Carinha replied: “Well, you just said that [the NYPD] sent something to the M.E's office so there is something in writing that said that somebody saw him fall, so something is in writing, right?” In other words, according to Carhina's logic, the NYPD memo mentioning the witness must be true simply because the memo existed.

– never investigated the fraudulent “investigation” by their colleagues at the DOI/NYPD, Squad, or the DOI's attempt to hijack the case from the OIG and bury it.

- never investigated the NYPD’s failure to investigate a death ruled as “undetermined” by the Medical Examiner.
DOI Chief Investigator Finds “Nothing Suspicious About the Sunny Sheu Case”

At the conclusion of the forty-five minute interview, Allimadi cut to the chase by asking Carinha a simple question: “Do you see [anything in the Sunny Sheu case] that looks suspicious?” to which Carinha answered without hesitation: “No”.

SHEU HAD “LOTS OF INJURIES; NOT JUST TO HIS HEAD”: MEDICAL EXAMINER

Despite the investigators' efforts to be opaque, Sanchez let slip one fact of great significance. He stated that he interviewed Dr. Michael Greenberg, the Medical Examiner who autopsied Sheu's body and subpoenaed his medical records, and according to Sanchez “[the Medical Examiner] determined that there was lots of injuries - not just to the head - and the matter was undetermined”. This is a bombshell: how could Sheu have sustained lots of his injuries to different parts of his body, simply by falling over and hitting his head? “Lots of injuries” is consistent with a man fighting for his life, not with a man having a seizure and falling straight down on the ground and into a coma. It also re-emphasizes the question of why Dr. Ahmed, who examined Sheu thoroughly in the hours before his death, told Sheu's friends that Sheu suffered no external injuries at all. How could Ahmed, in the course of four hours of intensive life saving procedures, have failed to notice significant injuries all over Sheu's body, in addition to the fatal “trauma to the head with multiple skull fractures and brain injuries”?

BSN LETTER TO OIG CHEIF INVESTIGATOR THOMAS MAHONEY RE: CARHINA
On January 18, 2015 the BSN wrote a letter to OIG Chief Inspector Thomas Mahoney - once again sent by certified mail and copied to Philip Eure, Mark Peters and Mayor De Blasio - entitled “ Profound Concerns Regarding Your Senior Investigator, Joseph Carinha”, and expressing the BSN's outrage over the bias and ignorance of the OIG Investigator. The BSN has never received a response from Mahoney, Eure, Peters or Mayor De Blasio.

THE OIG'S VIOLATION OF NY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAW.
Stonewalled by a total blackout of communication from the OIG, the BSN decided to request documents from them through the NY State Freedom of information law (FOIL). If the OIG had done any investigation on the case at all, we reasoned, they would have had to have subpoenaed, at the bare minimum:

- The name of the party that ordered the detention of Sunny Sheu in January 2009
- The records of the “interview” of Sheu by the Detectives who detained him
- The party that ordered the removal of Sheu's body from the Queens Hospital
- The police officers who removed Sheu's body from the Queens Hospital
- The name of the alleged “witness” who allegedly saw Sheu collapse
- Any NYPD paperwork the “interview” in which an alleged witness said he saw Sheu collapse
- The NYPD documents reflecting the false cause and false manner of Sheu's death, as cited by Detective Ardisano.
Under FOIL law, the OIG would, at the very least, be required to state whether each individual requested document was in their possession, if they were available to the public or not, and if not, precisely why not. Of course, according to the NYPD, and to OIG there was no crime and no evidence of a crime, and thus no investigation. So what could be the basis on which to keep any documents secret?
On January 19, 2015, the BSN sent a request for documents to the FOIL officer at the OIG, Assim Rehman, who is also the OIG's legal council. The request was unambiguous. It asked for “all documents” pertaining to 24 separate and distinct documents, relating to the death of Sunny Sheu and its cover up by the NYPD.

Under FOIL law - by default - every document generated by the government must be made available to the public, exceptdocuments which may be withheld or redacted because they fall under specific “exceptions” which are detailed in the FOIL law.

The response of Rehman was to utterly ignore the rules and precedent of FOIL case law. Rehman not only refused to provide a single document requested; he failed to specify the exception for each requested, illegally grouped all of the 24 demands together and denied them all in one sentence: “Any material which may be in the possession of this department that would be responsive to your request would be exempt from disclosure would interfere with law enforcement investigations”.

By this meticulously evasive wording, Rehman tried to skirt the pertinent question of which documents the OIG possessed, so that it could not be determined whether the OIG had actually investigated the case or not

WHY THE SUNNY SHEU CASE IS “SYSTEMIC”
Though it may seem a matter of semantics, the question of whether the BSN complaints to the DOI represent “systemic”problems with the NYPD or not, is the key to their jurisdiction. According to the OIG website, cases deemed “systemic” or regarding “policy or procedure” are under the unique jurisdiction of the OIG, and those considered “complaints against individual officers”, are under the jurisdiction of the NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau (IAB).

At the very least, the illegal detention of Sheu by NYPD Detectives, during which Sheu alleged that he was abducted against his will, his wallet confiscated, his documents photocopied and that he was threatened with death, is the ultimate example of “stop and frisk”; one of the “systemic” issues that the OIG is specifically mandated to investigate. 

But it is the failure of the Police Commissioner to order an investigation of a death ruled as undetermined by the M.E. that makes this case “systemic” prima face. The decision to not investigate a death ruled “undetermined” cannot possibly be the act of an individual officer, especially when two consecutive NYPD Commissioners were informed of the M.E's ruling and specifically told that they must investigate under law. The decision to not investigate a death ruled “undetermined” they depend on the police to investigate by the Medical Examiner, is a matter of “policy and procedure”, and a crime.

According to John Fudenberg, former President of the International Association of Coroners and Medical Examiners, “If a Medical Examiner has a case of “blunt force Trauma to the head, and they can’t tell if it’s a from a strike or a fall, they should and do depend on the police to attempt to get them more information… Homicide Detectives and Medical Legal Professionals are trained to treat every death as a homicide until they can prove otherwise, but especially if there is any indication that it might have actually been a homicide”.

THE OIG REFERS THE CASE TO THE NYPD INTERNAL AFFAIRS BUREAU, BUT WITHOLDS CRITICAL INFORMATION FROM THEM

A letter dated April 14th, 2015 from Thomas Mahoney of the OIG, states: “We have completed our preliminary investigation of your complaint... With respect to your specific concerns regarding the death of Mr. Sheu... Given the content of your July 23^rd[sic] complaint [originally sent to Eure on July 19, and dated as such] , we believe that the NYPD internal affairs Bureau (IAB) would be an appropriate investigative agency... therefore we will forward IAB a copy of your complaint so that they may review the matter further”.
Mahoney's letter certainly implies that it was the July 19 complaint that was sent to the IAB for further review, but incredibly, according to a source at the IAB, the “complaint” that the OIG sent them was not the July 19 complaint. Our source, who examined the entire file transferred from the OIG reported that the only document provided to the IAB by the OIG was the May 12 letter to Contes. He stated: “... April 8^th, that's when they sent the letter.... The only [complaint] they sent was [the email from] May 12^th, it was basically your correspondence with Mr. Contes. That's it'. He further confirmed that the July 19 letter was not provided by the OIG. This sleight of hand by Mahoney raises the question of whether the May 12^th letter may have been altered.

Why did Mahoney send the wrong letter to the IAB and lie about it to the BSN? Perhaps because the difference between the May 12 letter and the July 19 letter is critical to the jurisdiction of the case. The hijacking and burying of the case by the DOI/NYPD squad is detailed in the July letter but absent in the May letter, because it had not yet occurred . The OIG/NYPD Squad's fraudulent “investigation” not only adds to the long list of NYPD officers complicit in the cover up, it further establishes that the case is systemic, and therefore under the exclusive jurisdiction of the OIG.

And of course, leaving out the documented allegations against the NYPD/DOI gets the OIG's office mates at the NYPD/DOI off the hook, which may have been another intention.

ACCORDING TO THE IAB, THE OIG DID “NO INVESTIGATION” ON THE CASE BEFORE TRANSFERRING IT TO THEM.

Our source at the IAB also revealed that the dossier sent to the IAB by the OIG indicated that the OIG had done no investigation on the case, because no results of any investigation were included in the dossier. “I don't think [the OIG] did any investigation into it” she noted.

This means that either the OIG did no investigation whatsoever on the case, or they withheld the results of their investigationfrom the IAB when they transferred the case to them. If they did no investigation, then on what basis did Rehman deny the FOIL requests based on “an ongoing law enforcement investigation”? And what were they doing for the nine months between receiving the complaint in July and sending to the IAB in April?

Of course we know that Sanchez learned from the Medical Examiner that Sheu had suffered “lots of wounds” all over his body, and that this important fact was never provided to the IAB. What other findings of the nine-month OIG/NYPD “investigation” were concealed from the IAB?
NYPP INTERNAL AFFAIRS SITS ON THE CASE FOR SIX MONTHS WITH NO INVESTIGATAION, THEN TRANFERS IT TO THE DETECTIVE BUREAU WHICH CLOSE IT IN A WEEK. 
The NYPD IAB held the case for six months, and conducted no investigation, according to our source. On September 19, 2015, the IAB transferred the case to the NYPD Chief of Detectives Bureau. The sole detective delegated to investigate the case was Sgt. Anthony Bocola, a veteran NYPD cop sued in 2001 for punching a 13 year old dance student in the face.

Bocola confirmed that neither the DOI, OIG nor the IAB had furnished him with any findings resulting from their respective investigations, and only furnished him with the original May 12. 2014 complaint to John Kantor. This means that Bocola had no knowledge of the complaint to Inspector General Philip Eure which included documentation of the fraudulent claims by the NYPD/DOI Squad that they had investigated the case.

The NYPD Detective Bureau's Investigation is Completed in Less than Eight Days.

Although Bocola refused to comment on his investigation of the Sunny Sheu case, one very important aspect is apparent; the “investigation” was astonishingly brief.  Bocola received the complaint on September 19, 2015. Bocola's superior,  Lieutenant Simmons, refused to give a specific date for the closing of the case, but he told the BSN “it was closed in September of this year”.

Since September has only 30 days, this means that Bocola's investigation of the illegal detention/kidnapping, the death threats, the false statements of Dr. Ahmed, the unauthorized removal of the body by NYPD Detectives, the false witness” story sent to the Medical Examiner by Austin and Grant, the false reports given by Ardisano about the cause and manner of death, the unauthorized cremation of the body by a party falsely claiming to be the Executor of Sheu's estate, the violation of FOIL law by the NYPD and above all, the NYPD's failure to investigate a case ruled “undetermined” by the Medical Examiner for over five and a half years, was conducted in the maximum of one week.

Bocola Investigate and Closed the Case Without Interviewing Any of the Primary Witnesses, or Examining Any Evidence

Moreover, Bocola managed to complete the “investigation” without interviewing any witnesses or requesting any information from the BSN. In fact the BSN was never even told that the Case had been transferred to the CDB or that the case had been closed. BSN only found this out through our source at the IAB, two months after the fact.

The only positive thing that can be said about Bocola is that it only took him just eight to do exactly what it took the DOI, OIG and IAB 15 months months to do, namely to conduct a sham investigation, with the intention of covering up the circumstances of the Sunny Sheu case.

The Unbelievable Story Of The Queens Man Who Fought Foreclosure And Wound Up Dead

Sunny Sheu

Business Insider

LINK

The death of Queens judicial activist Sunny Sheu is the subject of a chilling investigation in the New York investigative newspaper Black Star News.

Here's a quick recap.

On a calm spring afternoon eleven years ago, Sunny Sheu's lunch was interrupted by a knock on his front door. It was Tower Insurance agent, there to inspect the home for its new owners.

Surprised, Sheu explained his home hadn't been for sale, but Tower's paperwork was official. "I almost choked on my soup," he told Black Star News in 2009 (via Zero Hedge).

The Queens resident had been victim of a complex scam that started with a forged power of attorney and led to a mortgage with Centex Home Equity. The story ended with his death from blunt force trauma to the head almost one year ago today.

Sheu refinanced his house in his brother's name in 2000. Sheu's mortgage broker, Roman Chiu then forged Sheu's brother's signature on a power of attorney and received a mortgage from Centex for Sheu's home.

After alerting the police, the bank that held the mortgage, and the title insurer, Sheu gathered together the forged paperwork, and the parties responsible were arrested and sent to jail. 

Sheu assumed that would be the end of it, but Centex--the issuer of the bogus mortgage--ignored the police reports as well as the evidence and foreclosed on the house.

The foreclosure sale occurred January 28, 2005.

“Centex bought the property for $1,000 from Amy Cheng, the fraudster,” Sheu said to Black Star. “That was not even her real name. How can you buy property from someone who does not exist?”

Finally, the case was assigned to Justice Joseph Golia in the State Supreme Court of Queens. Although extensive documentation had been enough to send the forgers to jail, Judge Golia said the assertion that the fraud occurred was "misleading and disingenuous at best.”

Following this ruling, Sheu began his own investigation. He found a list of Golia's properties and went to the OCA Ethics Department to check the list against the judge's financial disclosure forms.

According to Sheu, he found major discrepancies, including a $1 million beach home on Breezy Point Long Island. Judge Golia did not return phone calls from Black Star seeking comment on this matter. He also did not return a call fromBusiness Insider.  

Sheu's allegations were enough to get the director of the OCA Ethics Department Janice Howard to ask Golia for an amended financial disclosure statement. A last chance to come clean.

When Sheu went to pick up his copy of the amended statement, he brought a friend with a video camera. When he saw the paper lacked all the property conflicts Sheu had found, he's recorded saying: "Now I've got him! I've got enough evidence to put Golia in Jail."

Understanding the seriousness of the allegations, Sheu finally recorded a video stating that if any harm came to him, investigators should look to Judge Golia. We have embedded that video below.

According to Sheu's death certificate, three days later that he was found dead from a severe blow to the skull. The death has been ruled an accident by the medical examiner and no investigation has been conducted.

Further questions were raised by Black Star News:

Sheu’s associates also question why NYPD officers removed Sheu's body from the Queens hospital, at 5 AM, hours after his death, and transferred it to the Medical Examiner, who was provided with a letter stating that "no criminality" was involved, all without even a cursory investigation.

At the same time, the precinct involved in the removal, the 109, insisted that Sheu had suffered "no head trauma", a position contradicted by the Medical Examiner, who concluded that Sheu died of "blunt force trauma to the head with skull fractures and brain injuries".

Darkening the story further is the improper treatment of Mr. Sheu’s body by the New York Queens Hospital and their false statements regarding his injuries. (The role of the New York Hospital of Queens in the disposition of Sheu’s body will be elucidated in part two of this series.)

Add the epilogue of the NYPD's refusal to release relevant documents requested by this newspaper under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)- and all the components of a deeply disturbing mystery are in place.

What happened to Sheu and the antagonism between him and Judge Golia may never be fully known, but Black Star's report raises serious questions about the judge's ruling and Sheu's death.

Sunny Sheu's video is below. The medical examiner's opinion is here. You can read another summary of the story here, and the whole story at Black Star News.