Showing posts with label NYPD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NYPD. Show all posts

Monday, June 20, 2016

NYPD Chiefs Michael J. Harrington, James M. Grant, and David Villanueva Arrested on Federal Corruption Charges

Deputy Chief Michael Harrington, left, and Deputy Inspector James Grant

Here's List of Bribes 4 Arrested NYPD Officials Are Accused of Taking

LINK
By Peter Duffy | June 20, 2016 6:43pm
James Grant

NEW YORK CITY — Lavish trips, private jets, gifts and a prostitute. 
Court documents show the extensive list of goods and services received by four NYPD officials who were arrested Monday and charged with accepting bribes in exchange for police escorts, access and gun licenses.
Here's a breakdown of the ill-gotten gains listed in court documents:
Deputy Inspector James Grant
Las Vegas Trip, February 2013
• Grant received round-trip travel to Las Vegas on a private jet, a value of $59,000. 
• One of the passengers on the jet was a prostitute who then stayed in Grant's room and who spent the weekend in Las Vegas with Grant and his friends who "took advantages of her services during the trip," according to the indictment. 
• Grant's rooms and meals were comped during the trip.
Rome Trip, August 2013
• Grant and his family enjoyed a two-night stay in two hotel rooms in Rome, a value of $1,066. 
Other Financial Benefits
• Grant had the railings replaced outside of his Staten Island home, a value of approximately $6,000. 
• The windows were replaced in Grant's home, which cost approximately $6,000. 
• Grant's watch was upgraded, a value of approximately $3,000. 
• On Christmas Day in 2013, Grant received a video game system for his children and a piece of jewelry for his wife, a value of approximately $1,000. 
Deputy Chief Michael Harrington
Chicago Trip, 2014
• Harrington and family members stayed in a downtown Chicago hotel with three rooms for four nights and one room for two nights, a cost of approximately $6,500. 
Other Financial Benefits
• Between May 2013 and November 2014, Harrington was taken to dinner at least once or twice a week, typically at pricey Manhattan restaurants. The bill generally ran between $400 and $500. 
• Harrington received tickets to numerous sporting events, including two $400 tickets to the Brooklyn Nets in January 2014 and two $700 tickets for the New York Rangers in May 2014.
• On Christmas Day in 2013, Harrington received a video game system for his kids.
• For a period of 15 months, Harrington's security company was hired to work at a Manhattan school, receiving $5,000 per month for its services.
Sgt. David Villanueva
Villanueva received:
• Thousands of dollars in bribes.
• Bottles of liquor.
• Limousine rides.
• A limousine tour of wineries.
Officer Richard Ochetal
• Ochetal received cash and benefits.


3 New York Police Commanders Are Arrested on Corruption Charges

LINK

Three New York Police Department commanders, including a deputy chief, were arrested early Monday, along with a Brooklyn businessman, on federal corruption charges stemming from one of several continuing investigations into Mayor Bill de Blasio’s campaign fund-raising, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
The arrests, of a deputy chief, a deputy inspector and a sergeant, were one of the most significant roundups of police supervisors in the recent history of the department. In striking the top ranks, the case is a particular blow to the storied — and sometimes sullied — reputation of the nation’s largest municipal police force.
The charges detail lavish gifts the two senior police officials are accused of receiving: complimentary Super Bowl tickets, expensive meals and free overseas trips, including at least one taken in the company of a prostitute, the people said. The sergeant was charged in a scheme that involved aiding applicants for firearms licenses.
The gifts were largely paid for by two businessmen, both of whom have been generous supporters of the mayor. Jeremiah Reichberg, 42, of Borough Park, Brooklyn, was charged along with the officers, the people said. Jona S. Rechnitz, 33, of the Upper West Side, had been a target of the fund-raising investigation until recent weeks, when he pleaded guilty to corruption charges and began cooperating with the federal authorities, the people said.
The arrests in the early morning hours by agents with the F.B.I. and investigators from the Police Department’s Internal Affairs Bureau were followed by the execution of search warrants, the people said. The charges included bribery, honest services wire fraud and conspiracy, and they were scheduled to be announced at a news conference later on Monday.
Arrested were Deputy Chief Michael J. Harrington, 50; Deputy Inspector James M. Grant, 43; and Sgt. David Villanueva, 42. They were expected to appear in United States District Court in Manhattan on Monday afternoon. Their lawyers could not immediately be reached for comment.
While the charges being leveled against the police officials were uncovered during the fund-raising investigation focused on Mr. de Blasio, a Democrat, and his inner circle, there has been no suggestion that the mayor himself was involved in the conduct described in the charging documents in the case, which are expected to be unsealed Monday morning. The fund-raising investigation and several other inquiries by federal prosecutors, the F.B.I. and other agencies focused on the mayor’s donors and fund-raising were continuing. The scope of the broader fund-raising inquiries remains unclear.
Police Commissioner William J. Bratton has said the department believes investigators have identified all of the police officials involved in the alleged misconduct, though it is unknown whether the charges on Monday will conclude that line of inquiry by federal prosecutors, F.B.I. agents and Internal Affairs investigators.
The particular fund-raising investigation that led to these arrests has been going on for well over a year, and in recent months, details of some of the accusations against the police officials who have been charged — and others — have been widely reported in news accounts. Nearly a dozen mostly senior police officials have been disciplined by the Police Department in some way as a result of the inquiry — including some of those charged on Monday. Those disciplined include five deputy chiefs and a deputy inspector; four of the chiefs and the deputy inspector have put in for retirement.
Mr. Rechnitz’s cooperation with federal prosecutors and F.B.I. agents has already helped prosecutors bring corruption charges in another case linked to the same fund-raising investigation, people briefed on the matter have said. In that case, a criminal complaint unsealed on June 8 charged Norman Seabrook, the powerful head of the union that represents city correction officers, and Murray Huberfeld, a hedge fund financier, with honest services fraud and conspiracy.
That complaint said Mr. Rechnitz had pleaded guilty to committing honest services fraud in connection with the scheme in which Mr. Seabrook and Mr. Huberfeld were charged, “among other things,” suggesting he was involved in additional criminal conduct. While the document does not identify Mr. Rechnitz by name, referring to him only as CW-1, or Cooperating Witness 1, several people with knowledge of the matter said CW-1 was Mr. Rechnitz. At a news conference announcing the arrests of Mr. Seabrook and Mr. Huberfeld, Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, whose office filed the complaint, would not answer questions about the identity of CW-1 or the degree to which the witness could be helpful in other cases.
But Mr. Bharara indicated that the witness was “assisting other investigations.”
The criminal complaint in the earlier case details two trips that Mr. Rechnitz, Mr. Seabrook and another businessman — also a supporter of the mayor — took to the Dominican Republic. On the first one, in November 2013, they were accompanied by an unnamed officer from the Police Department. On the second one, in December 2014, the four men were accompanied by a fifth unnamed person. Mr. Rechnitz paid for the airfare for both trips.
Then, in March 2014, Mr. Seabrook, Mr. Rechnitz, the police officer and the other businessman — Mr. Reichberg, who was identified in the criminal complaint as Co-Conspirator 1 or CC-1 — traveled to Israel, with Mr. Rechnitz paying the airfare, according to the complaint. In July of that year, he paid for the same group to travel to Las Vegas and then Burbank, Calif., the complaint said.


Thursday, June 2, 2016

Two More Top NYPD Officials Retire Amid Cloud of Federal Probe: Sources

When public servants are corrupt, that is the worst corruption.

Betsy Combier
Bill Bratton and Preet Bharara

LINK
NEW YORK CITY — Two more high-ranking police officials under a federal NYPD corruption probe have filed for retirement, sources told DNAinfo New York.
Deputy Chief Eric Rodriguez and Deputy Chief Andrew Capul handed in their papers, making them the latest high-ranking NYPD supervisors to retire since the scandal broke two months ago.
Last week, Deputy Chief Michael Harrington, Chief David Colon and Deputy Inspector James Grant jumped from the NYPD ship after Police Commissioner Bill Bratton predicted that arrests were likely to stem from the sprawling federal investigation that includes pay-for-favors activities at the NYPD and Mayor Bill de Blasio’s various fundraising practices.
Rodriguez was the executive officer of Patrol Borough Brooklyn South when he was reassigned to desk duty as part of the FBI investigation. He had recently been honored by the NYPD’s Desi Society for his community service work.
Capul was the executive officer of the NYPD's Patrol Borough Manhattan North before he was placed on administrative desk duty in April.
He was previously the commanding officer of the 34th Precinct until 2010 when he was reassigned because of rising crime rates. He was also punched in the face during an Eric Garner protest march back in 2014.
Rodriguez served on the NYPD for more than 25 years, while Capul is a veteran with 32 years on the job.
Their retirement will become official if no department charges are brought against them during the next 30 days, which will then protect their pensions even if they are later arrested and convicted of a felony.
"No one has filed for service retirement with administrative charges pending or has been identified by federal investigators as a target of their investigation," Roy Richter, the president of the Captain Endowment Association, pointed out.
Grant, the former commander of the 19th Precinct, has also filed for retirement amid allegations he accepted discounted earrings and a free trip to Las Vegas from two businessmen with close ties to de Blasio and former NYPD Chief of Department Philip Banks.
The two-year federal probe started with a corruption tip involving Banks and eventually snared numerous police officials taking free meals, gifts and even trips from businessmen Jona Rechnitz and Jeremy Reichberg, who were members of de Blasio’s Inauguration Committee.
Two other officers from the NYPD License Division have also been stripped of their guns and badges during the probe for allegedly taking bribes from a Borough Park-based businessman, who was arrested for allegedly arranging gun permits for friends and clients for up to $18,000 each.


Friday, May 27, 2016

Another NYPD Official "Retires" From NYC Corruption

Bill De Blasio's legacy will be:  the Most Corrupt Mayor since William Magear (“Boss”) Tweed, the “Tiger of Tammany,” 

Boss Tweed




Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, Mayor De Blasio, Michael Harrington

Third High-Ranking NYPD Official Files for Retirement Amid Corruption Probe

NEW YORK CITY — A third high ranking NYPD official has filed for retirement amid the federal corruption investigation into a pay-for-favors scandal in the nation's largest police force, DNAinfo New York has learned.
Deputy Chief Michael Harrington, who was stripped of his badge and gun nearly two months ago, handed in his papers at Police Headquarters on Thursday, sources said.
The three-decade veteran, who was second in command in the NYPD’s citywide housing bureau, is the third top commander this week to leave the NYPD since Commissioner Bill Bratton said he expected arrests in the probe.
Harrington, who comes from a long line of respected officers, served previously as the right hand man for then-Chief of Department Philip Banks, who was the initial target of the now 2 1/2-year federal investigation.
Under city regulations, officers who retire are guaranteed their respective pensions even if they are arrested and convicted of a felony. Commissioner Bratton has 30 days to file charges against an officer, if warranted, that would halt their departure until the charges are resolved.
Banks, who has not been charged with any crime, took trips and junkets with two wealthy businessmen, Jona Rechnitz and Jeremy Reichberg, who served on Mayor de Blasio’s Inauguration Committee. 
The federal investigation of the NYPD centers on allegations that police officials took gifts in exchange for favors. The probe has also expanded to City Hall, where top mayoral advisers are being eyed over how they raised funds for various de Blasio political agendas.
Roy Richter, president of the Captain’s Endowment Association, declined to comment.
Deputy Chief David Colon, a 30-year veteran, filed for retirement on Wednesday, a day after Deputy Inspector James Grant pulled the plug on his career just shy of his 20th anniversary in the department.
Colon was known to hang out in the now-shuttered Harlem restaurant Hudson River Café, which was owned by Hamlet Peralta, a suspected con man recently arrested by the feds for operating a $12 million Ponzi scheme linked to the corruption scandal.
Deputy Inspector James Grant, who had served as the commander of the Upper East Side's 19th Precinct before his name surfaced in the scandal, is suspected of taking discounted jewelry and a trip to Las Vegas on a private jet from the two businessmen in exchange for police escorts.
Police officials said this week that they can't prevent individuals from retiring. However, they were able to reject a retirement application from Detective Michael Milici, who served as the Community Affairs officer at the 66th Precinct in Borough, because he took the Fifth when approached by the FBI — a violation of departmental policy.
Milci, who had more than 20 years on the force, was instead fired by Commissioner Bratton. But because of his tenure he is allowed to collect his full pension.
As many as another 10 officers — mostly high level officials — have been caught up in the federal probe, including two in the License Division who are suspected of taking money in exchange for gun permits without proper background checks.

Friday, January 16, 2015

Michael C. Dorf: Civilian Control of the Police

Re-posted from VERDICT and National Public Voice:

Friday, January 16, 2015

Michael C. Dorf: Civilian Control of the Police


Civilian Control of the Police 

in NYC

LINK

Roman emperors formally staked their power on Senate recognition, but in practice their authority depended on support from the legions and the Praetorian Guard. Despite its republican traditions, in its imperial phase, Rome was a dictatorship—sometimes a benevolent one, but a dictatorship nonetheless—because truly representative government demands civilian control of state force. For that reason, Article II of the U.S. Constitution makes the President, a civilian, Commander in Chief of the armed forces.

As with the nation, so with its parts. Thus, recent actions by a not inconsiderable number of New York Police Department (NYPD) officers to challenge the authority of Mayor Bill de Blasio by refusing to enforce the law should raise loud alarms. Police officers are entitled to express pointed disagreement with their civilian leaders, but when that disagreement crosses the line into defiance, democracy itself is threatened.

The Underlying Dispute

In considering where to draw the line between permissible protest and mutiny, it is important to set aside the substance of the underlying disagreement. That may bedifficult to do in this instance, because the position of protesting NYPD officers is, not to put too fine a point on it, ugly.

Consider the now-infamous statement of NYC Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch that Mayor de Blasio had “blood on his hands” for the murder of officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu by a man who may have drawn some inspiration from anti-police-brutality protesters but was clearly a dangerous and deranged criminal.

What, exactly, did de Blasio do to render himself culpable in the killing of Ramos and Liu in the eyes of Lynch and his supporters? In the wake of a Staten Island grand jury’s failure to issue an indictment for the choking death of Eric Garner, de Blasio had the temerity to speak the indisputable truth that young African American men like his own son are at elevated risk in encounters with the police. De Blasio has repeatedly acknowledged the difficult and dangerous work that police do, but that was not enough to satisfy Lynch, who sees police–civilian interactions in Manichean terms: Because de Blasio does not offer all NYPD officers 100 percent backing in everything they do, Lynch denounces him.

Legitimate Speech

Police Chief William Bratton and some supporters of Mayor de Blasio have criticized the NYPD officers who turned their backs on the mayor at the funerals for Ramos and Liu on the ground that they were exploiting a tragedy to make a political point. That is a legitimate criticism of the officers’ judgment, but the officers were within their rights to exercise bad judgment or even to give offense. Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. Phelps underscores the proposition that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, even offensive speech that aims to use a funeral for political purposes.

More broadly, police officers have a right to speak out on matters of public concern, even if doing so could be seen as somewhat undermining the authority of their civilian leaders.

As a Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote in the 1892 case of McAuliffe v. Mayor of New Bedford that a plaintiff who had been fired from his position as a police officer “may have a constitutional right to talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be a policeman.” Yet constitutional law long ago rejected the Holmesian view that the state may, as a condition of employment, suppress otherwise protected speech.

Under the modern employee speech doctrine, public employees do not forfeit their right to speak as citizens on matters of public concern simply by virtue of accepting a government job. Government may not suppress such speech by its employees unless doing so is necessary to the effective provision of services.

The NYPD officers who turned their backs on Mayor de Blasio were expressing an odious view, but they were nonetheless “speaking” as citizens on a matter of public concern. And while the incidents caused embarrassment to the mayor, the police commissioner, and others, they did not interfere with the provision of police protection in any clear way.

To see why the First Amendment protects NYPD officers in expressing their displeasure with the mayor, imagine that they were making a different point. Suppose that in the wake of the Garner non-indictment, the mayor gave a public speech praising the NYPD for its aggressive use of force, and that some officers turned their backs at that speech. Surely many of the people who now condemn the NYPD officers for their treatment of Mayor de Blasio would praise the hypothetical officers for their courage in confronting their leaders, for speaking truth to power.

An Illegal Strike

Police officers also have a legal right to another kind of speech. They can organize to form a union that, in turn, can collectively bargain on their behalf. Some of the issues that are legitimately subject to collective bargaining are also matters of public policy. For example, whether police must be outfitted with body cameras is both a matter of working conditions for the police and civil rights of the public.

But New York law generally denies to public employees the right to strike. Whatever the merits of the general provision, the reason for the prohibition of police strikes is obvious. A strike in some other sector may cause financial losses and public inconvenience, but a strike by the police threatens the very foundation of government.

The NYPD are not formally on strike, but over the last several weeks, the number of arrests and tickets for relatively minor offenses as well as some not-so-minor offenses (such as gun possession and drunk driving) reportedly declined substantially. Although there is no clear evidence of a coordinated refusal by police to enforce the law, the same report (a New York Timesstory) indicates at least informal coordination. Call it a stealth strike.

Whether overt or covert, a police strike is dangerous and illegal. Where, as appears to be true here, the tacit strike threatens the public safety unless elected leaders give in to the strikers’ policy demands, democracy itself is under attack. There is no place in New York or America for a Praetorian Guard.

[ 6:42 ] Hide Player | Play in Popup | Download (76)
Michael C. Dorf, a Justia columnist, is the Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School and the principal author of The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Constitutional Law. He blogs atDorfonLaw.org.

- See more at: http://verdict.justia.com/2015/01/14/civilian-control-police-nyc#sthash.UhfuNImG.dpuf


Friday, February 14, 2014

Mayor Bill Makes A Call To the NYPD, Gets A Friend Set Free and Would Do It Again

Mayor Bill De Blasio and Reverend Orlando Findlayter
 

de Blasio on pastor arrest: Phone call was ‘absolutely appropriate’

, Feb 13, 2014

Mayor de Blasio on Thursday defended his decision to ring an NYPD boss about a pastor pal’s arrest, saying the controversial call was “absolutely appropriate.”
De Blasio also wouldn’t rule out making similar calls in the future, saying such decisions are “made on a case by case basis.”
“It’s absolutely appropriate if I make an inquiry,” de Blasio told reporters, addressing for the first time the criticism that he’d used his influence to help a political benefactor who’d been instrumental in delivering black votes for the mayor.
De Blasio insisted that the phone call he made to a police spokeswoman on behalf of pastor Orlando Findlayter — who was sprung from jail soon after the call — was merely an above-board request for information.
“A prominent member of the clergy was facing an unusual situation,” he said of Findlayter, who’d been pulled over Monday night in East Flatbush for turning without signaling.
Findlayter was being kept in custody due to his having a suspended license and two open arrest warrants for failing to go to court after an October bust at an immigration protest.
De Blasio appeared impatient and dismissive in turn as he spoke to reporters during a press conference on the snow emergency, held at the Office of Emergency Management in downtown Brooklyn.
The mayor said he had found out about Findlayter’s arrest from an aide, Emma Wolf, and then “made an inquiry’ with NYPD spokeswoman Kim Royster.
He stressed that the decision to release Findlayter came from the precinct commander. “The precinct commander made a professional decision,” based on the fact that the open warrants were only for a civil disobedience arrest, he said.
The precinct moved independently and quickly, the mayor said. “By the time I even got an answer the decision had been made,” he said.
“I thought the police commander handled it well,” he added.
De Blasio also stressed that he did not call Police Commissioner Bill Bratton over the matter.
The mayor’s call on behalf of Findlayter — essentially a pastor without a bricks and mortar church after he fell behind in his rent at his New Hope Christian Fellowship church in East Flatbush — has been widely condemned as a tacit instruction to cops to let his buddy go.

Mayor de Blasio calls a top cop after pal arrested — and then the friend is freed

Mayor de Blasio spokesman Phil Walzak confirmed that the mayor called a top police official early Tuesday morning to find out more about the arrest of Bishop Orlando Findlayter, a member of Mayor de Blasio’s transition team, who was wanted on two outstanding warrants.

 
 LINK
Comments (142)
Updated: Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 11:20 AM
A church pastor with outstanding warrants — and a position on Mayor de Blasio’s inaugural committee — dodged a night in the slammer after Hizzoner made a call to one of the city’s top cops.
Bishop Orlando Findlayter, 50, was released from custody early Tuesday after de Blasio inquired about his status.
RELATED: PASTOR, BISHOP, NUN AMONG 10 ARRESTED AT NYC IMMIGRATION REFORM RALLY

It was not clear how many other prisoners were released without seeing a judge that night, but people with warrants are usually held until the matter is cleared up in court.
Sgt. Ed Mullins, president of the Sergeants Benevolent Association, said the minister should have gone to jail.

RELATED: OBAMA URGES CONGRESS TO COMPLETE WORK ON IMMIGRATION BILL

Bishop Orlando Findlayter is out of jail after his arrest Monday on outstanding warrants
stemming from the clergyman's involvement in an immigration reform protest.


“We don’t let you go. You’re not supposed to let them go. It’s a court order from a judge,” he said. “We can’t circumvent that. This is not a common practice. But I get it. I realize you’re the mayor and you got all kinds of friends.”
Still, cops and de Blasio deny Findlayter got special treatment in this bizarre story that reads like “A Jail of Two Cities.”
RELATED: IMMIGRATION REFORM COULD BE YEARS OFF

Pro-immigration reform activists Bishop Orlando Findlayter and Sister Susan Wilcox are led to a police
van after being arrested in October during a protest outside the ICE Immigration Detention Center.
“Did the mayor call me last night about this particular person and his status?” Deputy Chief Kim Royster told the Daily News. “Yes he did.”
The mayor made the call after members of a local clergy council contacted him and the NYPD after Findlayter’s arrest.
RELATED: TIME TO PRESS GOP ON IMMIGRATION REFORM
Bishop Orlando Findlayter (left) was arrested Monday for outstanding warrants related to his
immigration reform protests in October.
 


The church of Bishop Orlando Findlayler, who was arrested Monday after a traffic stop, leading to
cops discovering two outstanding warrants.
While running a check, police learned Findlayter had an aggravated suspended license due to a lapse in auto insurance, Royster said. Cops took Findlayter to the 67th Precinct stationhouse, where they discovered two outstanding warrants stemming from his Oct. 16 arrest during an immigration protest.
By then, it was too late to take Findlayter to Brooklyn arraignment court before it closed at 1 a.m.
Following de Blasio’s call, Royster spoke with Deputy Inspector Kenneth Lehr, commander of the 67th Precinct. She said Lehr had also been contacted by local clergy. The inspector was already at the stationhouse preparing to give the pastor a desk appearance ticket when she spoke to him, she said. Royster said Lehr told her: “‘Why have a clergyman in the command in jail overnight?’” Lehr, who has worked with Findlayter on community issues, personally released him.
“Did the mayor in any way persuade or say anything to whether or not this person would be arrested or released? Not at all,” Royster said. She added “it’s not unusual” for her to get calls from city officials about individuals taken into custody.
Findlayter, who could not be reached for comment, appeared in court Tuesday and the warrants were vacated, officials said.
With Chelsia Rose Marcius and Kerry Burke